Contact Information:Phone: (505) 830-1038
Fax: (505) 830-1381
Hello to everyone. For several months I have been absent from the site because of illness. I’m back now and promise to publish some interesting and perhaps controversial entries related to the field of sexual offending. Stay tuned!
Today the Associated Press reported that a man shot and killed the man who had sexually molested his daughter in 2001. His daughter was seven-years-old at the time of the molestation. Raymond Brooks was the man who was shot and killed. In 2002, he was convicted of sexual abuse and sentenced to five years in prison but later was placed on probation. The exact reasons for the shooting were unclear at the time the report was published. No clear connection between the sex offense conviction and the shooting has bee made.
There are lots of “ifs: to this story. If the shooter killed Brooks because of the sex offense he committed, was he (the shooter) justified? Many people would say “no” because the law had taken its course and should not be interfered with. Some would say “yes” because a brief prison sentence cannot compare with the lifetime of anguish experienced by the victim of sexual assault.
The question of what do we do with convicted sex offenders again rears its head. Sentences are sometimes less than those experienced by those in possession of drugs. Should consequences be more intense? Is it wrong for victims to mete out their own punishments given the extreme damage inflicted upon them by offenders? Will stronger sentences deter others from committing similar crimes?
The public must decide how it wishes sex offenders to be dealt with and consequences must be swift, appropriate and consistent. If this ever happens it may not be necessary to evaluate the behaviors of the shooter who killed Raymond Brooks.
When there is news of convicted sex offenders committing another sex offense people are often confused as to how this could occur especially since most sex offenders have to register. It is important to understand what registration accomplishes and what it does not accomplish. Basically registration is a notification process. Offenders must provide current information to law enforcement personnel regarding where they live and work and other such information which would facilitate making contact with them. The law also provides for the establishment of a public information site which contains specific sex offender demographics. This is the “sex offender website”. Registration does not prevent anyone from re-offending. The process simply let’s us know (generally) where sex offenders can be found. There is controversy surrounding sex offender registration laws (which are established by individual states and some Indian tribes). Are the laws fair? Do we even need them? Do they open the door for unwarranted discrimination against offenders? These questions are being debated as we speak. What do you think?
One of the biggest challenges we face in managing convicted sex offenders is helping them find suitable housing once they return to the community. Of the few landlords that will rent to them, many [landlords] offer substandard apartments at inflated rents. I propose that we develop highly structured (supervised) units for ex-offenders on probation. They would consent to rental agreements, pay reasonable rents and be subject to conditions such as restricted visitors, regularly scheduled unit inspections, no alcohol or other drugs, etc. This is a project that I am now seeking funding for. Sex offenders must live somewhere. Why not provide environments and conditions which decrease the probability of re-offense?